Showing posts with label versions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label versions. Show all posts

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Backup Compatibility?

I've heard that backups are compatible across all versions of SQL Server
2005, but haven't yet found this in print from MS.
Does anyone know of a link or document to verify or refute this?
TIA,
dj"dj" <dj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FD19460-C578-4AD3-8555-2B5E1B337976@.microsoft.com...
> I've heard that backups are compatible across all versions of SQL Server
> 2005, but haven't yet found this in print from MS.
> Does anyone know of a link or document to verify or refute this?
>
If you mean within 2005 yes. Can I find a document, no but consider the
engine is the same across all, just with different options, I can't imagine
it would be any other way.
Having said that, because of ENGINE differences, you may have issues. I
doubt you could restore a database larger than 4 gig to an Express edition
since express can't run it.

> TIA,
> dj|||"dj" <dj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FD19460-C578-4AD3-8555-2B5E1B337976@.microsoft.com...
> I've heard that backups are compatible across all versions of SQL Server
> 2005, but haven't yet found this in print from MS.
> Does anyone know of a link or document to verify or refute this?
>
If you mean within 2005 yes. Can I find a document, no but consider the
engine is the same across all, just with different options, I can't imagine
it would be any other way.
Having said that, because of ENGINE differences, you may have issues. I
doubt you could restore a database larger than 4 gig to an Express edition
since express can't run it.

> TIA,
> dj

Backup Compatibility?

I've heard that backups are compatible across all versions of SQL Server
2005, but haven't yet found this in print from MS.
Does anyone know of a link or document to verify or refute this?
TIA,
dj"dj" <dj@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FD19460-C578-4AD3-8555-2B5E1B337976@.microsoft.com...
> I've heard that backups are compatible across all versions of SQL Server
> 2005, but haven't yet found this in print from MS.
> Does anyone know of a link or document to verify or refute this?
>
If you mean within 2005 yes. Can I find a document, no but consider the
engine is the same across all, just with different options, I can't imagine
it would be any other way.
Having said that, because of ENGINE differences, you may have issues. I
doubt you could restore a database larger than 4 gig to an Express edition
since express can't run it.
> TIA,
> dj

Friday, February 24, 2012

Backup a single table?

In SQL 6.5 you could backup a single table in a db to a
backupdevice or a file. I can not find this in the newer
versions SQL 7.0 and SQL 2000. Is this feature removed?
I know that the command has changed from DUMP to BACKUP
and that you nowadays often backup db-files or filegroups
instead.This feature has been removed with SQL2000
"Stefan" <stefan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:033c01c4b815$4a8a0600$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> In SQL 6.5 you could backup a single table in a db to a
> backupdevice or a file. I can not find this in the newer
> versions SQL 7.0 and SQL 2000. Is this feature removed?
> I know that the command has changed from DUMP to BACKUP
> and that you nowadays often backup db-files or filegroups
> instead.
>|||> I know that the command has changed from DUMP to BACKUP
> and that you nowadays often backup db-files or filegroups
> instead.
You will have to either (a) put it onto its own filegroup and backup the
filegroup, or (b) DTS a copy into an empty database and backup that
database.
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)